Many "Wild" Fires are ARSON
some allowed to burn out of control. It's not "Climate Change"
Wildfires are out of control in California. It’s not even “Fire Season”. Why is this happening?
Many causes have been profferred. The forest is not properly managed. Water was diverted to create artificial scarcity until fire hydrants run dry. Fire prevention programs were cut back to give the money to illegals or DEI programs, etc. Fire insurance was cancelled. “Climate change”. None of these contributing factors actually STARTED any fires. It takes fuel, air and a spark to get a fire started.
Few have looked at what actually started these fires. Many are ARSON. Even when a fire started naturally, if it could have been extinguished but was intentionally allowed to burn and get out of control….isn’t that also a form of ARSON?
Here’s your alleged arsonist being arrested in LA. According to several posts, he was carrying FIVE cell phones and a UN issued prepaid cash/debit card.
It’s not difficult to start a fire and it’s no mystery. It takes fuel and a spark. Some fires have been caused by nature (lightning) and downed power lines. Mrs. O’Leary’s cows kicked over the lantern and started the Great Chicago Fire. Some are started intentionally.
These hikers were very near the scene of where the Palisades fire broke out. These videos were removed from Twitter. “that sh*t is going great”. Not sure they wanted to say that, as people might get the wrong impression they started it. Law enforcement needs to interview them and check all cell tower location data.
The result is billions of $$ in damage and big payouts to the Disaster Economy. Many people stand to benefit from these fires by collecting disaster relief and clean up is vastly overpriced. Lots of hands are greased with all the disaster money.
Fires being allowed to burn out of control are actually a thing. Our ranch burned down in the Walbridge fire of 2020. A former Calfire employee who was shooting video immediate after the fire told me “They were notified about this fire when it was 3 acres and a helicopter crew was requested. This was denied. Then when the fire was 50 acres, a manned crew was requested. Again denied.” He was baffled why they would NOT fight a fire when it’s small. It went on to burn down 55,000 acres of forest and 150 homes. Once a fire grows in size, it can’t be stopped, all you can do is try to save structures.
More here, including the receipts for $1.5m worth of clean up on a small cabin that should have cost no more than $50k.
As for the arsonists, you should assume they are enemy combatants and deal with them appropriately.
A popular meme.
The arsonist is, imo, a patsy like the JFK shooter or 911 pilots. This was posted on kitten's:
Stegiel The Journal of Lingering Sanity
https://youtu.be/nzzoCw3Q5o8?t=4
"Worth time. There is aluminum chaff over Area 51. It is found on the radars moving into Southern California by the jet stream. In the end this is full spectrum warfare. Extinction level events. Sometimes the psychology of power is beyond the criminal and also insane."
Here's her full post: https://kitten.substack.com/p/normal-or-not and also Heather B: https://blissandblisters.substack.com/p/i-love-la.
This is an old playbook. It reminds me of The Great Fire of London in 1666. "History" tells us that the fire started by accident in a bakery on Pudding Lane; but "history" is a pack of lies written by the winners.
The parliamentary inquiry into The Great Fire concluded that it was arson, ordered by King Charles II. He brought in agents from France (where he lived in exile after his father was executed at the end of The English Civil War) to set the fires. Some of them were caught red handed and were only saved from being lynched by the mob by the personal intervention of the King's brother, Prince James Stuart, Duke of York, and his personal corps of bodyguards. Those Frenchies were never seen or heard of again.
It is thought that Charles was after revenge for the execution of his father by the Parliamentarians, who had been backed by the money changers in the City of London. When Charles came to the throne, the money changers in The City continued their campaign against the Stuarts by denying Charles the loans he needed. So Charles burned The City down. There were plans for a grand re-building and re-shaping of The City, only some of which came to fruition.
https://www.amazon.com/Architecture-Power-Clash-Beliefs-London/dp/1916287530
https://www.youtube.com/@BritainsHiddenHistoryRoss/search?query=shaw